Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

For God's Sake...!!!

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
-Serj Tankian

These views, I am putting as eye drops, so that picture get visible to all. These came into my mind when I watched the movie "Khuda ke Liye". Something that Naseerudin (who plays the good maulana) says about religion gave a new direction about spirituality to my mind. He said that the external manifestations of religion like the way one dressed are not important. It’s the way one lives that is far more important. He said that many evil people use these external garbs that symbolize religious faith but are actually evil people. There are many things explained by him which is an education for non-Muslims like me. This movie is worth a see, particularly because it comes from Pakistan, a religious country.


One of the characters talks about the majority of Pakistanis being able to read Arabic, but not understand it. This is just same as Most of the hindus/even pandits don't know why they join their palms and use tilak while praying to God. They don't know what is the meaning of the sloks written in Geeta, but they can chant it for hours.

Lets begin a journey to the center of the matter. Origin of human being to the time we live in. How terrorism took shape and why this path of terrorism is taken by educated youths?

Civilization is a slow process of adopting the ideas and implementing them for the welfare of people.
-Simply Saying


If we look back to progress of human civilization, we find that at the initial stage for centuries man had to fight continuously with the fierce beasts in the jungle, for their survival. As a result man became aggressive, self-centered to save himself. When they learnt to live in groups, due to conflict of interest there were often fight between groups. Man did not hesitate to kill animals and also men of other groups. Then kingdoms came into existence and fight of strength and dominance spread all over world. Then countries divided boundaries which led to world wars. Thus violence and hatred became inherent in human character.


Religion is to do right. It is to love, it is to serve, it is to think, it is to be humble.
-Ralph W. Emerson


With the dawn of religions, smell of peace and calmness developed and man learnt to worship God for their benefit and also learnt to love others. The most powerful exponent for peace was Gautam Buddha. Millions of people of many countries were inspired with the preaching of Buddha that non-violence and peace is the most valuable asset of human civilization. Jesus Christ sacrificed his life for the cause of love, justice and peace. Hazarat Mohammed Sahab, founder of Islam religion, also preached for justice, peace and love. Each religion had the core theme of spreading peace in world. All these religions play a vital role in developing ethical values in the society and sense of natural justice.


Even the best of friends face conflicts, but that needn't mean the end of the relationship.
-Simply Saying

Who don’t have conflicts? Even feelings of injustice and discrimination give rise to conflict. Children fight over small things because of the conflicts they have on the number of pencils and toys. These feelings may have some real basis or it may be only because of some imaginary ideas. Something happens to somebody doesn’t mean it will happen with everybody. Sometimes false ego gives rise to conflict. And in that situation the egoistic person don't listen anything which can help him settle the conflicts. Conflicts are also created or imposed upon by person or groups for some evil motive to make some gain out of it. In a multi-dimension, multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-lingual, multi-cultural country like India there is always a challenge on ethnic, communal, language or cultural issues creating conflicts. The contradiction between the privileged and deprived sections of the people, educated and illiterate people, people of higher caste and lower caste within the same religion, social discrimination between men and women are the major sources of conflict. Resolution of conflict becomes easier when a sense of natural justice prevails in the society.

What our leaders never notices that the terrorists -- whichever religion they follow, how much educated they are, whichever state or country they might belong to -- might also be rational human beings; which is to say that in their own minds they have a justification for their actions. Most terrorists are people deeply effected by what they see as social, political, or religious injustice and hypocrisy.

-William Blum


If a person is mentally/economically/socially unsatisfied with society, feels boycotted by society, feels discriminated or simply feels lonely in fast moving world, then what he needs is a group of people who will offer him support. And the terror spreading groups offer them more than that, they brainwash the person to absurd levels and the victim is hooked. And religion is often used to do this because this is where all the conflicts ends and more than 95% of the population believe in some or the other super power/God.


If we go through the profiles of the offenders who have been arrested in concern with the terrorist activities are well educated and employed/established in a so called urban society. These educated youth become influenced by an Islamic activist/Hindu Extremist/Greedy Politicians. They begin to practice the extremist interpretation of Islam/Hindu/any religion, grows a beard/moustache and goes against/in favour of music.


The most ill and terrible thing about terrorism is that ultimately it destroys whoever practice it. Slowly but surely, as they try to extinguish life in others, the light within them dies.

-Terry Waite


They are educated men with loving families and therefore if they got caught as terrorist, they have to take some of the blame on them too. How can a brilliant mind take such inhuman steps. Ultimately they are not only destroying the world but themselves.

Its a great way to just say God told you to kill. But God never tell so to any of his followers.If there will be no religion to take as excuse, then these evil people of the world would find other justifications to kill. Did Hitler/world war used religion? his aim to capture the whole world was sufficient for him. Revenge is often another justification used to murder innocent people. Evil people always justify their deeds.


Thus the conclusion to curb terrorism is not to find terrorists (specially in particular community) but to find why people are taking such steps and make them come again to Life full of happiness and satisfaction. The reason, I think, why the educated people taking the path of terrorism is one word term "Falling out" (hearing or understanding what is going on around one but feeling powerless to change something, feeling alone due to discrimination which may be false impression, dissatisfaction with the way society works). All criminals need a brotherhood.

The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
-Galatians 5:22 Bible


Actually, no religion justifies a behavior of killing people or suicide, and Islam is no exception. Islam is not just a religion but a beautiful poetry of God which spread love, care, bonding with God, peace and harmony. Religion is there to live happily and it should not be used as counter for peace. People who use this term for their self interest should stop such evil deed because this is not only affecting them but to whole mankind.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

JODHA-AKBAR : An Unknown Mythical Love Story

JODHA-AKBAR : An Unknown Mythical Love Story
A vast canvas movie with a royal touch ... deeply history-studied script by Ashutosh for even the minutest of the scene but lost in the big battles.....All in all; as a critic also I praise the efforts but few changes in the script, a better study on the dressing sense of Rajputs with cultural study of Rajput women and tightening the few lose scene would have made the movie to OSCARS next year......but unfortunately ....it will not ....!

Why to visit theatres to see Jodha-Akbar:
1. Big Budget, vast canvas, historical movie directed by well known Ashutosh Gowarikar after a deep study of Akbar.
2. Actors and technicians have done a great job.
3. Amazing music by A.R.Rehman, specially the background theme music.
4. Brilliant cameras work to portrait the scenes.
5. Sultan of Hindustan- Jalalludin Mohammad Akbar (Hrithik Roshan), beyond wordy appreciation.
6. Great Dialogues.
7. Royalty of Rajputana and Akbar’s reign.
8. Big sets and Battlefield scenes.
9. Huge number of junior artists dancing on the songs.
10. A large number of animals used for give a real tough to the war sequences.
11. Film showing ‘Communal Harmony’ and ‘farsighted Emperor’ in the story.
12. Film showing ‘care for animals, they need freedom and love’.
13. Jewellery and Costumes specially Emperor’s Belt.
14. Beautiful Jodha Bai (Aishwariya Rai Bachchan)
15. Courage and loyalty of Rajputana.
16. Last but not the least, how to waste your 300 bucks and 4 hrs time ..?
Few of the Facts and scenes which were indigestible being a big historical movie’s fan and ofcourse as a Rajput too......

Why not to visit theatre to see Jodha-Akbar:
a) AG(Ashutosh Gowarikar) should have visited all the museums and forts of each district in Rajasthan to provide a better look to the RAJPUTANA and Ofcourse the KINGS’ royalty.

b) The Fashion designer (Costume) should have visited the museum showcasing the dresses worn by the females and particularly the queens and princesses of Rajputana of that time, because they dresses shown in the movie don’t reflect real dressing sense of Rajputs.

c) While introducing kings from different royal families of Rajputana, most of them were made known dressed in same type of attire with same-a-like royal turbans, while in Rajasthan each district is having different typical turbans completely different from other.

d) The Jewellery Designer has done a great job and has revealed the true golden age of Rajputana with the type of ornaments but missed most of the archetypal classics of Rajaputana ornaments worn on the Arms of the ladies called “Bajuband” in Rajasthan and “Shishphool” worn on the front head below the “Rakhri”, specially the “Aad” which is worn as big necklace. And a special ornament having a feather worn on the turban by the rajputs was also missing.

e) The way, interaction of the Rajput females is shown with the males was impossible even 10 years back while it is a story of 16th century. So AG should have visited an emblematic village to see the illustrative culture.

f) From the historic books which we have been reading since childhood, it is revealed that Akbar asked the King of Amber(read as Amer) to reign under his regime and the king of Amber accepted the offer in favour of the citizens of Rajputana. When Akbar came to know about that Ajmer is under Amber’s king and it is one of the sacred place for Muslims with the holy blessings of Khwaja Saheb, and is also in route for saintly places of Mecca-Medina, he thought of taking a harmonious decision in favour of both the communities by marrying a Hindu princess of King of Amber which was completely cordial-in-agreement. And after a lot of disputes with the neighboring states of Amber, King finally took the decision of marrying her daughter with the then Sultan of India who the country sociable. While in the flick, it is shown that king of Amber went with the proposal of her daughter’s marriage, which in all sense, impossible as a normal Rajput can never do such thing then it is impossible being a king to do so. And he had no reason to do this, at the same time, even AG has shown two contradictory things of King’s proposal and then Akbar’s proposal. Here the story starts failing.

g) Now comes the main point, there is no such love story of JODHA-AKBAR even in the Historic books(of which AG is talking about while clarifying that he made it after a deep study).

h) The movie could have been a great success if AG would have made the AKBAR as the royal ruler with his regime and success story of winning India with a small essence of his love for his wife. But the love story portrayed him as a emotional fellow who ruled from someone else help, getting all decisions from army head, Khan baba(the prime minister) and his babysitter whom he treated just like mother. AG experimented with the facts and flick ended up with the bundle of 3hr45min packages of unknown history (or creativity of his mind) which no one want to even know, as out of total movie time only 1hr was worth watching and other time AG was bitten by Sanjay Leela Bhansali virus of spreading his own virtual imagination on spectators mind which is unacceptable in the current scenario where people are quite intelligent to decide what to accept and reject as movie input.

i) The length of the movie could have been shortened as there were n numbers of unwanted lengthy scenes in it.

j) Akbar is shown as an illiterate Sultan, which historical book has revealed till this end?(one of my friend has said that it is true as written in NCERT 8th class book, chapter-Mughal Emperors)

k) Emperor’s wrestling is indigestible as it was just director’s creativity.